Supreme Court nixes expanded judicial review of arbitration awards (but stay tuned ….)

March 26, 2008

Yesterday the Supreme Court rejected the view that parties to an arbitration agreement, at least under the Federal Arbitration Act, can agree to expanded judicial review of the arbitrator’s award. See Hall Street Assoc., L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., No. 06-989 (U.S. Mar. 25, 2008) (hat tip: SCOTUSblog). 

I’ve put a more detailed write-up at the 100 Feet Up wiki.

Comments



Got something to say? CAUTION: Comments are public, so don't disclose anything confidential or privileged (you might blow the privilege). By leaving a comment here, you agree that your doing so does not establish an attorney-client relationship, and that this site's materials should not be relied on as (or as a substitute for) legal advice by an attorney licensed in the relevant jurisdiction(s).